1. Inicio
  2. node
  3. Agency Profile - DMDA

Agency Profile - DMDA

Defense Missile Defense Agency (DMDA) FY 2013 EEO Complaint Processing Statistics

Outcome of Counselings Completed in FY 2013
Pre-Complaint Counseling OutcomesCompleted by EEO CounselorCompleted Using ADRAll Completed Counselings
#%#%#%
Pre-Complaint Counselings4 0 4 
Settlements00%00%00%
Withdrawals or No Complaints Filed00%00%00%
Complaints Filed*    4100%
Decision to File Complaint Pending at End of FY    00%

*Includes only complaints filed in FY 2013 where counseling was also completed during FY 2013.

Agency Use of ADR for EEO Dispute Resolution in FY 2013
 Total NumberOffer RateParticipation Rate
Pre-Complaint Counselings4100%0%
Complaint Closures425%25%
Bases Most Frequently Alleged in FY 2013 Filed Complaints
 Top Basis 1Top Basis 2Top Basis 3
Bases of Alleged DiscriminationAGEREPRISALDISABILITY (PHYSICAL)
Timeliness in FY 2013
 Total ## Timely% TimelyFY 2012 APD*FY 2013 APD*% ChangeGovt Wide APD*
All Pre-Complaint Counselings (minus remands)4125%    
All Investigations300%23729725.3%207
All Complaint Closures4  0228NA%420
Merit Decisions (no AJ)000%00NA%451
Dismissal Decisions (no AJ)2  060NA%67

*APD = Average Processing Days

Outcomes of Complaints in FY 2013
#%#%#%#%
 Complaint ClosuresFinal Agency Decision
(no AJ Decision)		Final Order
(AJ Decision
Fully Implemented)		Final Order
(AJ Decision
Not Fully Implemented)
Total Complaints Filed6       
Total Closures4       
Settlements125%      
Withdrawals00%      
Total Final Agency Actions375%266.7%133.3%00%
Dismissals266.7%2100%00%00%
Merit Decisions133.3%00%1100%00%
Finding Discrimination0NA%0NA%0NA%0NA%
Finding No Discrimination1100%00%1100%00%
Costs Associated with EEO Process in FY 2013
 Total #Total AmountAverage Amount
Pre-Complaint Settlements w/Monetary Benefits0$0$0
ADR Settlements w/ Monetary Benefits0$0$0
Investigation Costs3$15,688$5,229
Complaint Closures with Monetary Benefits0$0$0
ADR Settlements w/ Monetary Benefits0$0$0
Enabled In-page Navigation