The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Defense Human Resource Activity (DHRA)

Permanent Workforce:  864    Temporary Workforce:  16    Total Workforce: 880

Work Force Composition*

Total # Men Women Hispanic or Latino White Black or African American Asian Native Hawaiian/ Other Pacific Islander American Indian/ Alaska Native Two or More Races Individuals with Targeted Disabilities
Permanent Workforce

864

38.77%

61.23%

6.60%

68.52%

18.29%

5.56%

0.00%

0.69%

0.35%

0.46%

Major Occupations:
Human Resources Management

348

42.53%

67.53%

62.07%

24.71%

2.59%

0.00%

0.57%

0.57%

0.00%

0.00%

Management and Program Analysis

94

43.62%

59.57%

79.79%

11.70%

2.13%

0.00%

3.19%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Information Technology Management

196

59.18%

48.47%

71.94%

8.67%

12.24%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

GS-14 and GS-15*

235

39.57%

60.43%

3.83%

80.00%

11.49%

4.26%

0.00%

0.43%

0.00%

0.00%

Senior Pay Level*

10

30.00%

70.00%

0.00%

100.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

SES

10

30.00%

70.00%

0.00%

100.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

First-Level Officials/Managers

0

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Mid-Level Officials/Managers

76

46.05%

53.95%

3.95%

78.95%

10.53%

6.58%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Senior-Level Officials/Managers

79

48.10%

51.90%

0.00%

89.87%

10.13%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Unclassified Managers

0

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

*Includes data for only permanent employees in pay status as of September 30, 2006; does not include pay-banded employees.


Targeted Disabilities

DHRA employed 4 Individuals with Targeted Disabilities in FY 2006, which was 0.45% of its total work force.  This is the same as the number of employees in FY 2005 and no change in the number of employees since FY 2002.  The participation rate for FY 2005 was 0.50% and for FY 2002 was 0.60%.  Over the 5-year period DHRA had a net decrease of 0.15% in employees with targeted disabilities.

EEO Complaint Processing

I.  Counseling

DHRA timely processed 20% of the 5 pre-complaint counselings (without remands) completed in FY 2006.

II.  Bases of Complaints Filed

The bases of alleged discrimination most often raised were: (1) Race (Black) and (2) Sex (Male).  The 4 complaints filed at DHRA contained 2 allegations of race (Black) discrimination, 1 allegation of race (White) discrimination, 1 allegation of color discrimination and 1 allegation of disability discrimination.

III.  Complaint Processing Times

DHRA timely completed the one investigation it reported completing in FY 2006. DHRA's average time for completing an investigation was 102 days.  Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Office of Personnel Management had the lowest average of 105 days.

DHRA average processing time for all complaint closures increased from 291 days in FY 2005 to 592 days in FY 2006.  The government-wide average was 367 days.

IV.  Costs

DHRA reported no counseling settlements in FY 2006.  DHRA expended $4,373 for the one investigation it completed in FY 2006.

DHRA reported no complaint closures through settlement agreement, final agency decision, or final agency order fully implementing an AJ decision in FY 2006.



Outcome of Counselings Completed in FY 2006

Pre-Complaint Counseling Outcomes Completed by EEO Counselor Completed Using ADR All Completed Counselings
# % # % # %
Pre-Complaint Counselings:

5

0

5

Settlements

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

Withdrawals or No Complaints Filed

1

20%

0

0%

1

20%

Complaints Filed*

4

80%

Decision to File Complaint Pending at End of Fiscal Year

0

0%

*Includes only complaints filed in FY 2006 where counseling was also completed during FY 2006.

Agency Use of ADR for EEO Dispute Resolution in FY 2006

Counseling Complaint**
Completed/Ended Counselings/Complaint Closures

5

5

Total Number Offered ADR

0

0

ADR Offer Rate*

0%

0%

ADR Participation Rate*

0%

0%

Total ADR Settlements

0

0

Total ADR Settlements Amount

$0.00

$0.00

*Using newly collected data, EEOC revised the formula for calculating the ADR offer and participation rates in FY 2006.

**Includes all complaints filed in the fiscal year, including those where the counseling was completed in the prior fiscal year.

Timeliness in FY 2006

Total # # Timely % Timely FY 2005 APD* FY 2006 APD % Change
All Pre-Complaint Counselings (minus remands)

5

1

20%

All Investigations

1

1

100%

151

102

-32.5%

All Complaint Closures

5

291

592

103.4%

Merit Decisions (no AJ)

1

0

0%

291

367

26.1%

Dismissal Decisions (no AJ)

0

0

0

NA%

*APD = Average Processing Days

Outcomes of Complaints in FY 2006

Complaint Closures Final Agency Decision (no AJ Decision) Final Order (AJ Decision Fully Implemented) Final Order (AJ Decision Not Fully Implemented)
# % # % # % # %
Total Complaints Filed

4

Total Closures

5

Settlements

0

0%

Withdrawals

0

0%

Total Final Agency Actions

5

100%

1

20%

4

80%

0

0%

Dismissals

0

NA%

0

NA%

0

NA%

0

NA%

Merit Decisions

5

 100%

1

20%

4

80%

0

0%

Finding Discrimination

0

NA%

0

NA%

0

NA%

0

NA%

Finding No Discrimination

5

 100%

1

20%

4

80%

0

0%


This page was last modified on June 21, 2007.

Home Return to Home Page